The law was clearly established that governmental restriction of expressive conduct violated the First Amendment if the restriction was motivated by the speaker’s message. Likewise, a reasonable officer in Reno’s position would know that the law forbade her from directing the execution of a warrant in a manner that called for unjustified force against bystanders...Defendant’s argument relating to her entitlement to qualified immunity adopts a construction of the alleged wrongful conduct, and of the corresponding right to be free from such wrongful conduct, which relies on circumstances not established in the pleadings.