Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Judicial Watch

Corruption Chronicles

Clinton Judge Upholds Law Letting Police Check Immigration Status

A Clinton-appointed federal judge has ruled that Arizona can enforce a provision of its immigration control law that allows local police to check the migratory status of suspects and arrestees.

Not surprisingly, the open borders movement was quick to claim it will create a hostile and discriminatory environment for all Latinos, even those who have legal U.S. residency or citizenship. In fact, the head of the civil rights group challenging the law assures that, once it goes into effect, “racial profiling will become rampant statewide.”

The group, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) promises to document racial profiling abuses throughout Arizona as a first step to guaranteeing equal treatment under the law. “Latino members of our community should not be subjected to unlawful stops based on their race or perceived immigration status,” according to the director of the local chapter, who hostilely refers to the upheld statute as “show me your papers.”

The ruling, issued this week by U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton in Phoenix, allows local law enforcement to check on the immigration status of people they stop in the course of their duties. In June the U.S. Supreme Court upheld this part of Arizona’s law, but the open borders movement insisted the provision be blocked because it could lead to racial discrimination.

In her decision, Judge Bolton reminded that the Supreme Court had already upheld that part of Arizona’s immigration control law and that she could not block the measure based on the possibility of racial profiling. “Without a set of as-applied facts, the Supreme Court has held that it would be speculative to decide as a matter of law that (the provision) will be enforced in an unconstitutional manner,” she wrote.

Bolton’s ruling did block another portion of Arizona’s immigration control law, which was passed more than two years ago but has faced a multitude of legal challenges. It creates a statute making it a state crime to harbor or transport illegal immigrants. Judge Bolton determined that it conflicts with federal law because the federal government has broad and exclusive authority to regulate immigration.

Regardless, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer applauds the decision because it allows the state to finally begin enforcing the most critical section of a law passed to curb an illegal immigration crisis. That’s because it empowers state and local law enforcement, as part of a legal stop or detention, to inquire about an individual’s immigration status when the officer has reasonable suspicion. Brewer assures it will be enforced “efficiently, effectively and in harmony with the Constitution and civil rights.”  

 

 

 

Related

Lawsuit for Epstein Files

Judicial Watch Sues for Emails of FBI Executive Abusing Whistleblowers Judicial Watch Sues Justice Department for Epstein Client Lists Border Crossings Lowest in History, from 155,...

Judicial Watch Sues Justice Department for Epstein Client Lists

Press Releases | April 11, 2025
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice for records regarding Jeffrey Epstein,...

Judicial Watch Sues for Emails of Anti-Trump FBI Executive Accused of Harassing Whistleblowers

Press Releases | April 09, 2025
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) for emails of Dena Perkins,...