Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Judicial Watch

Press Releases

Judicial Watch Files Open Records Lawsuit Against Chicago Police Department Over Illegal Alien Sanctuary Policy

Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has filed an open records lawsuit against the Chicago Police Department related to the department’s policies concerning illegal immigration. Judicial Watch’s lawsuit, (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Chicago Police Department, #06CH28084), filed on December 22, 2006 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, asks the court to compel the Chicago Police Department to comply with Judicial Watch’s October 13, 2006 Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking documents pertaining to policies and procedures governing the interaction between Chicago police officers and known or suspected illegal aliens.

Judicial Watch began its investigation after learning of a resolution under consideration by the Cook County, Illinois Board of Commissioners that would declare Cook County a “Sanctuary County” for illegal aliens. The resolution seeks to conform the Cook County Sheriff’s Office immigration policy to a Chicago Police Department policy that prevents county employees from assisting with immigration enforcement and/or reporting suspected illegal immigrants to federal authorities. Judicial Watch launched an investigation to determine whether or not these policies and procedures are “consistent with the requirements of federal law.”

“Sanctuary policies are affront to the rule of law, worsen illegal immigration crises, and put American citizens at risk,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Local police departments cannot continue to undermine federal immigration law. The Chicago Police Department should be required to comply with the Illinois Freedom of Information Act so taxpayers can understand its immigration policies.”

Judicial Watch’s lawsuit against the Chicago Police Department is part of a nationwide campaign to help enforce our nation’s immigration laws. For example, Judicial Watch is battling ACLU lawyers in a lawsuit against the Los Angeles Police Department over “Special Order 40,” a policy that prohibits police officers from inquiring about an individual’s immigration status, and reportedly restricts police officers from cooperating with federal immigration officials. Judicial Watch is asking the court to prohibit the LAPD from expending taxpayer funds to enforce and maintain Special Order 40.

In addition to the LAPD, Judicial Watch is also investigating the immigration policies of the Orange County, California Sheriff’s Office and police departments in Houston, Texas and Westchester County, New York. (Judicial Watch is also challenging taxpayer-funded illegal alien day labor sites in Virginia and California.)

Related

Judicial Watch: Sues California to Stop Counting of Ballots Received after Election Day –…

Press Releases | March 13, 2025
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a federal lawsuit against California on behalf of U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa to prevent state election officials from ex...

Soros-Funded Charity Sues U.S. Over Budget Cuts at Tribal University Plagued by Fraud, Corruption

Corruption Chronicles | March 13, 2025
A federal lawsuit filed by yet another George Soros-funded group highlights how the Trump administration’s swift crackdown on wasteful government spending is enraging leftists whos...

Georgia judge slams Fani Willis deceit in Trump case

In The News | March 13, 2025
From The Washington Examiner: A Georgia judge has ripped Trump critic and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis for falsely denying having records of conversations with one-t...