Skip to content

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Judicial Watch, Inc. is a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, which promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

Because no one
is above the law!

Donate

Tipsheets

Judicial Watch Victories, and more!

Top Headlines of the Week

Press Releases


Judicial Watch Victory: Court Rules against Democratic Partisan Gerrymander in Maryland

Judicial Watch announced recently that the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County ruled in favor of Judicial Watch’s challenge to Maryland’s congressional redistricting plan. In its ruling the court permanently barred Maryland’s use of its current plan.

Judicial Watch: Records Reveal Fauci Emails about Hydroxychloroquine and COVID

In March, Judicial Watch publicly released emails and other records obtained through a FOIA lawsuit of Fauci and Dr. H. Clifford Lane from HHS showing that NIH officials tailored confidentiality forms to China’s terms and that the WHO conducted an unreleased, “strictly confidential” COVID-19 epidemiological analysis in January 2020. Additionally, the emails reveal an independent journalist in China pointing out the inconsistent COVID numbers in China to NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases’ Deputy Director for Clinical Research and Special Projects Lane.

Judicial Watch Victory: Sixth Circuit Judicial Council Vacates Order Punishing Federal Judge Who Pushed for Timely Justice in Social Security Benefits Cases

Judicial Watch announced recently that, as part of the settlement of a historic federal lawsuit, the Sixth Circuit Judicial Council is vacating an unprecedented and entirely unwarranted order by a disciplinary panel that found U.S. District Court Judge John R. Adams committed misconduct by objecting to undergoing a psychiatric examination and ordered him to submit to the examination.

Judicial Watch Sues for Records of COVID-19 Travel Exemptions Granted to Biden Administration Officials

“COVID restrictions have been too often ignored by government officials, and Americans have a right to know if federal employees used their positions of power to see their families when others could not,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

 

In The News


TimCast: Exclusive: Maryland Court Rules Against Democrats In Gerrymandering Case

The lawsuit was filed by Judicial Watch, a nonprofit judicial and government watchdog group, on behalf of 12 registered Maryland voters who “object to Maryland’s 2021 congressional redistricting plan on the grounds that it is a partisan gerrymander that diminishes their rights to participate in free, fair elections for the U.S. Congress on an equal basis with other Maryland voters, in violation of the Maryland Constitution. The trial also included plaintiffs from a separate lawsuit,” the group wrote in a press release.

Fox News: HHS sued by watchdog for info on COVID-19 vaccine side effects: ‘Unlawful stonewall’

Legal watchdog Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit Thursday against the Department of Health and Human Services after the department did not provide requested information and communications about COVID-19 vaccine side effects.

“Americans have a right to know about any and all safety issues tied to the COVID vaccines,” said Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton in a press release obtained by Fox News Digital.

Fox News: Outrage after Ketanji Brown Jackson says she ‘can’t’ define the word woman: ‘Legit bizarre’

Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson was sharply criticized after she couldn’t define the word “woman” during her Senate Judiciary confirmation hearings Tuesday night.

“The ideological extremism behind this professed ignorance, ironically, will likely lead to the upending of legal and constitutional prohibitions against sex discrimination. If one can’t define what a ‘woman’ is, how can one protect ‘women’ from discrimination?” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton asked.

 

The Fitton Report



Related

Afghanistan Gets $122.5 Mil to Combat Gender-Based Violence under Taliban with no Follow Up

Corruption Chronicles | December 17, 2024
In the latest scandal to rock the Biden administration’s massive Afghanistan aid boondoggle, the U.S. government has been derelict in its duty to measure the effectiveness of a $12...

Fani Willis Update

Fani Willis Hides Communications with January 6 Committee and Jack Smith Wray’s Resignation Is a Good First Step Judicial Watch Sues Biden Admin for Info about Tulsi Gabbard Being ...

Judicial Watch Sues for Records on Tulsi Gabbard being Placed on Terrorist Watch List

Press Releases | December 13, 2024
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed on December 9, 2024, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (D...