![](/wp-content/themes/judicial-watch/assets/images/logo-color.png)
![](/wp-content/themes/judicial-watch/assets/images/logo-color.png)
NIH censorship of critics unconstitutional, appeals court says, HHS sued for COVID coverup records
![](https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/NIH.png)
![](https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/NIH.png)
From Just the News:
The National Institutes of Health doesn’t want you to use the words “animal,” “testing” or “cruel” in comments on its social media pages. Too bad, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit told the agency.
Animal experimentation is at the heart of First Amendment and Freedom of Information Act litigation against the feds, with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals recently defeating NIH in court and Judicial Watch suing the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for stonewalling its requests for communications about an alleged COVID-19 coverup.
Neither agency responded to Just the News queries for their response to the legal developments.
Read more here…