[{"id":148319,"date":"2024-12-13T11:26:25","date_gmt":"2024-12-13T16:26:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?post_type=documents&p=148319"},"modified":"2024-12-13T11:26:25","modified_gmt":"2024-12-13T16:26:25","slug":"jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427","status":"publish","type":"documents","link":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/","title":{"rendered":"JW v DHS Gabbard motion to expedite 03427"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","financial-disclosures":[],"class_list":["post-148319","documents","type-documents","status-publish","hentry","document_tags-44428","document_tags-gabbard"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>JW v DHS Gabbard motion to expedite 03427 - Judicial Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"JW v DHS Gabbard motion to expedite 03427 - Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/\",\"name\":\"JW v DHS Gabbard motion to expedite 03427 - Judicial Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-13T16:26:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-13T16:26:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Documents\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"JW v DHS Gabbard motion to expedite 03427\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/\",\"name\":\"Judicial Watch\",\"description\":\"Because no one is above the law!\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"JW v DHS Gabbard motion to expedite 03427 - Judicial Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"JW v DHS Gabbard motion to expedite 03427 - Judicial Watch","og_url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/","og_site_name":"Judicial Watch","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch","og_image":[{"width":160,"height":160,"url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@JudicialWatch","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/","name":"JW v DHS Gabbard motion to expedite 03427 - Judicial Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-13T16:26:25+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-13T16:26:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-motion-to-expedite-03427\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Documents","item":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"JW v DHS Gabbard motion to expedite 03427"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/","name":"Judicial Watch","description":"Because no one is above the law!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents\/148319"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/documents"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"financial-disclosures","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/financial-disclosures?post=148319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":148317,"date":"2024-12-13T11:26:16","date_gmt":"2024-12-13T16:26:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?post_type=documents&p=148317"},"modified":"2024-12-13T11:26:16","modified_gmt":"2024-12-13T16:26:16","slug":"jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427","status":"publish","type":"documents","link":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/","title":{"rendered":"JW v DHS Gabbard scheduling order 03427"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","financial-disclosures":[],"class_list":["post-148317","documents","type-documents","status-publish","hentry","document_tags-44428","document_tags-gabbard"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>JW v DHS Gabbard scheduling order 03427 - Judicial Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"JW v DHS Gabbard scheduling order 03427 - Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/\",\"name\":\"JW v DHS Gabbard scheduling order 03427 - Judicial Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-13T16:26:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-13T16:26:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Documents\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"JW v DHS Gabbard scheduling order 03427\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/\",\"name\":\"Judicial Watch\",\"description\":\"Because no one is above the law!\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"JW v DHS Gabbard scheduling order 03427 - Judicial Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"JW v DHS Gabbard scheduling order 03427 - Judicial Watch","og_url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/","og_site_name":"Judicial Watch","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch","og_image":[{"width":160,"height":160,"url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@JudicialWatch","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/","name":"JW v DHS Gabbard scheduling order 03427 - Judicial Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-13T16:26:16+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-13T16:26:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-gabbard-scheduling-order-03427\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Documents","item":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"JW v DHS Gabbard scheduling order 03427"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/","name":"Judicial Watch","description":"Because no one is above the law!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents\/148317"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/documents"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148317"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"financial-disclosures","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/financial-disclosures?post=148317"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":148286,"date":"2024-12-13T11:26:07","date_gmt":"2024-12-13T16:26:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?post_type=documents&p=148286"},"modified":"2024-12-13T11:26:07","modified_gmt":"2024-12-13T16:26:07","slug":"jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427","status":"publish","type":"documents","link":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/","title":{"rendered":"JW v DHS Tulsi Gabbard complaint 03427"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","financial-disclosures":[],"class_list":["post-148286","documents","type-documents","status-publish","hentry","document_tags-44428","document_tags-gabbard"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>JW v DHS Tulsi Gabbard complaint 03427 - Judicial Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"JW v DHS Tulsi Gabbard complaint 03427 - Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/\",\"name\":\"JW v DHS Tulsi Gabbard complaint 03427 - Judicial Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-13T16:26:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-13T16:26:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Documents\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"JW v DHS Tulsi Gabbard complaint 03427\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/\",\"name\":\"Judicial Watch\",\"description\":\"Because no one is above the law!\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"JW v DHS Tulsi Gabbard complaint 03427 - Judicial Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"JW v DHS Tulsi Gabbard complaint 03427 - Judicial Watch","og_url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/","og_site_name":"Judicial Watch","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch","og_image":[{"width":160,"height":160,"url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@JudicialWatch","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/","name":"JW v DHS Tulsi Gabbard complaint 03427 - Judicial Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-13T16:26:07+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-13T16:26:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-dhs-tulsi-gabbard-complaint-03427\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Documents","item":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"JW v DHS Tulsi Gabbard complaint 03427"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/","name":"Judicial Watch","description":"Because no one is above the law!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents\/148286"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/documents"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"financial-disclosures","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/financial-disclosures?post=148286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":148311,"date":"2024-12-11T19:14:02","date_gmt":"2024-12-12T00:14:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?post_type=documents&p=148311"},"modified":"2024-12-11T19:18:54","modified_gmt":"2024-12-12T00:18:54","slug":"hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427","status":"publish","type":"documents","link":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/","title":{"rendered":"Hedgepeth v Britton appeal 03790 1427"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","financial-disclosures":[44432,44433,44431],"class_list":["post-148311","documents","type-documents","status-publish","hentry","financial-disclosures-44432","financial-disclosures-44433","financial-disclosures-hedgepeth"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Hedgepeth v Britton appeal 03790 1427 - Judicial Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hedgepeth v Britton appeal 03790 1427 - Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-12-12T00:18:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/\",\"name\":\"Hedgepeth v Britton appeal 03790 1427 - Judicial Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-12T00:14:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-12T00:18:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Documents\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hedgepeth v Britton appeal 03790 1427\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/\",\"name\":\"Judicial Watch\",\"description\":\"Because no one is above the law!\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hedgepeth v Britton appeal 03790 1427 - Judicial Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hedgepeth v Britton appeal 03790 1427 - Judicial Watch","og_url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/","og_site_name":"Judicial Watch","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch","article_modified_time":"2024-12-12T00:18:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":160,"height":160,"url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@JudicialWatch","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/","name":"Hedgepeth v Britton appeal 03790 1427 - Judicial Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-12T00:14:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-12T00:18:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-appeal-03790-1427\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Documents","item":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hedgepeth v Britton appeal 03790 1427"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/","name":"Judicial Watch","description":"Because no one is above the law!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents\/148311"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/documents"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148311"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"financial-disclosures","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/financial-disclosures?post=148311"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":148309,"date":"2024-12-11T17:17:51","date_gmt":"2024-12-11T22:17:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?post_type=documents&p=148309"},"modified":"2024-12-11T17:17:51","modified_gmt":"2024-12-11T22:17:51","slug":"hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427","status":"publish","type":"documents","link":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/","title":{"rendered":"Hedgepeth v Britton oral argument order 03790 1427"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","financial-disclosures":[],"class_list":["post-148309","documents","type-documents","status-publish","hentry","document_tags-40890","document_tags-33354","document_tags-hedgepeth"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Hedgepeth v Britton oral argument order 03790 1427 - Judicial Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hedgepeth v Britton oral argument order 03790 1427 - Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/\",\"name\":\"Hedgepeth v Britton oral argument order 03790 1427 - Judicial Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-11T22:17:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-11T22:17:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Documents\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hedgepeth v Britton oral argument order 03790 1427\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/\",\"name\":\"Judicial Watch\",\"description\":\"Because no one is above the law!\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hedgepeth v Britton oral argument order 03790 1427 - Judicial Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hedgepeth v Britton oral argument order 03790 1427 - Judicial Watch","og_url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/","og_site_name":"Judicial Watch","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch","og_image":[{"width":160,"height":160,"url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@JudicialWatch","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/","name":"Hedgepeth v Britton oral argument order 03790 1427 - Judicial Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-11T22:17:51+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-11T22:17:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/hedgepeth-v-britton-oral-argument-order-03790-1427\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Documents","item":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hedgepeth v Britton oral argument order 03790 1427"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/","name":"Judicial Watch","description":"Because no one is above the law!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents\/148309"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/documents"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"financial-disclosures","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/financial-disclosures?post=148309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":148264,"date":"2024-12-10T08:59:57","date_gmt":"2024-12-10T13:59:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?post_type=documents&p=148264"},"modified":"2024-12-10T08:59:57","modified_gmt":"2024-12-10T13:59:57","slug":"jw-v-willis-default-response-002805","status":"publish","type":"documents","link":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/","title":{"rendered":"JW v Willis default response 002805"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","financial-disclosures":[],"class_list":["post-148264","documents","type-documents","status-publish","hentry","document_tags-44022","document_tags-willis"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>JW v Willis default response 002805 - Judicial Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"JW v Willis default response 002805 - Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/\",\"name\":\"JW v Willis default response 002805 - Judicial Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-10T13:59:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-10T13:59:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Documents\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"JW v Willis default response 002805\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/\",\"name\":\"Judicial Watch\",\"description\":\"Because no one is above the law!\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"JW v Willis default response 002805 - Judicial Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"JW v Willis default response 002805 - Judicial Watch","og_url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/","og_site_name":"Judicial Watch","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch","og_image":[{"width":160,"height":160,"url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@JudicialWatch","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/","name":"JW v Willis default response 002805 - Judicial Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-10T13:59:57+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-10T13:59:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-response-002805\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Documents","item":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"JW v Willis default response 002805"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/","name":"Judicial Watch","description":"Because no one is above the law!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents\/148264"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/documents"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148264"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"financial-disclosures","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/financial-disclosures?post=148264"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":148213,"date":"2024-12-05T13:19:35","date_gmt":"2024-12-05T18:19:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?post_type=documents&p=148213"},"modified":"2024-12-05T13:40:31","modified_gmt":"2024-12-05T18:40:31","slug":"jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380","status":"publish","type":"documents","link":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/","title":{"rendered":"JW v. DOJ Milley complaint 03380"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","financial-disclosures":[],"class_list":["post-148213","documents","type-documents","status-publish","hentry","document_tags-44422","document_tags-complaint","document_tags-doj"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>JW v. DOJ Milley complaint 03380 - Judicial Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"JW v. DOJ Milley complaint 03380 - Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-12-05T18:40:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/\",\"name\":\"JW v. DOJ Milley complaint 03380 - Judicial Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-05T18:19:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-05T18:40:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Documents\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"JW v. DOJ Milley complaint 03380\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/\",\"name\":\"Judicial Watch\",\"description\":\"Because no one is above the law!\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"JW v. DOJ Milley complaint 03380 - Judicial Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"JW v. DOJ Milley complaint 03380 - Judicial Watch","og_url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/","og_site_name":"Judicial Watch","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch","article_modified_time":"2024-12-05T18:40:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":160,"height":160,"url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@JudicialWatch","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/","name":"JW v. DOJ Milley complaint 03380 - Judicial Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-05T18:19:35+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-05T18:40:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-doj-milley-complaint-03380\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Documents","item":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"JW v. DOJ Milley complaint 03380"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/","name":"Judicial Watch","description":"Because no one is above the law!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents\/148213"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/documents"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"financial-disclosures","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/financial-disclosures?post=148213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":148191,"date":"2024-12-03T12:21:57","date_gmt":"2024-12-03T17:21:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?post_type=documents&p=148191"},"modified":"2024-12-03T12:21:57","modified_gmt":"2024-12-03T17:21:57","slug":"jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805","status":"publish","type":"documents","link":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/","title":{"rendered":"JW v Willis default judgment 002805"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","financial-disclosures":[],"class_list":["post-148191","documents","type-documents","status-publish","hentry","document_tags-44022","document_tags-default","document_tags-judgment","document_tags-willis"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>JW v Willis default judgment 002805 - Judicial Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"JW v Willis default judgment 002805 - Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/\",\"name\":\"JW v Willis default judgment 002805 - Judicial Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-03T17:21:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-03T17:21:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Documents\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"JW v Willis default judgment 002805\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/\",\"name\":\"Judicial Watch\",\"description\":\"Because no one is above the law!\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"JW v Willis default judgment 002805 - Judicial Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"JW v Willis default judgment 002805 - Judicial Watch","og_url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/","og_site_name":"Judicial Watch","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch","og_image":[{"width":160,"height":160,"url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@JudicialWatch","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/","name":"JW v Willis default judgment 002805 - Judicial Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-12-03T17:21:57+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-03T17:21:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/jw-v-willis-default-judgment-002805\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Documents","item":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"JW v Willis default judgment 002805"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/","name":"Judicial Watch","description":"Because no one is above the law!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents\/148191"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/documents"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148191"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"financial-disclosures","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/financial-disclosures?post=148191"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":148106,"date":"2024-11-25T11:44:46","date_gmt":"2024-11-25T16:44:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?post_type=documents&p=148106"},"modified":"2024-11-25T11:44:46","modified_gmt":"2024-11-25T16:44:46","slug":"oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings","status":"publish","type":"documents","link":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/","title":{"rendered":"Oct 22-25, 2024 Nurjaman (10019) Pre-Trial Hearings"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","financial-disclosures":[],"class_list":["post-148106","documents","type-documents","status-publish","hentry","document_categories-gtmo-archive"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Oct 22-25, 2024 Nurjaman (10019) Pre-Trial Hearings - Judicial Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Oct 22-25, 2024 Nurjaman (10019) Pre-Trial Hearings - Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/\",\"name\":\"Oct 22-25, 2024 Nurjaman (10019) Pre-Trial Hearings - Judicial Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-25T16:44:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-25T16:44:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Documents\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Oct 22-25, 2024 Nurjaman (10019) Pre-Trial Hearings\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/\",\"name\":\"Judicial Watch\",\"description\":\"Because no one is above the law!\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Oct 22-25, 2024 Nurjaman (10019) Pre-Trial Hearings - Judicial Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Oct 22-25, 2024 Nurjaman (10019) Pre-Trial Hearings - Judicial Watch","og_url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/","og_site_name":"Judicial Watch","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch","og_image":[{"width":160,"height":160,"url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@JudicialWatch","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/","name":"Oct 22-25, 2024 Nurjaman (10019) Pre-Trial Hearings - Judicial Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-11-25T16:44:46+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-25T16:44:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/oct-22-25-2024-nurjaman-10019-pre-trial-hearings\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Documents","item":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Oct 22-25, 2024 Nurjaman (10019) Pre-Trial Hearings"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/","name":"Judicial Watch","description":"Because no one is above the law!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents\/148106"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/documents"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148106"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"financial-disclosures","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/financial-disclosures?post=148106"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}},{"id":148104,"date":"2024-11-25T11:44:08","date_gmt":"2024-11-25T16:44:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?post_type=documents&p=148104"},"modified":"2024-11-25T11:44:08","modified_gmt":"2024-11-25T16:44:08","slug":"sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings","status":"publish","type":"documents","link":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/","title":{"rendered":"Sept 16-20, 2024 KSM, et al., Pre-Trial Hearings"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","financial-disclosures":[],"class_list":["post-148104","documents","type-documents","status-publish","hentry","document_categories-gtmo-archive"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Sept 16-20, 2024 KSM, et al., Pre-Trial Hearings - Judicial Watch<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sept 16-20, 2024 KSM, et al., Pre-Trial Hearings - Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Judicial Watch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@JudicialWatch\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/\",\"name\":\"Sept 16-20, 2024 KSM, et al., Pre-Trial Hearings - Judicial Watch\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-25T16:44:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-25T16:44:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Documents\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sept 16-20, 2024 KSM, et al., Pre-Trial Hearings\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/\",\"name\":\"Judicial Watch\",\"description\":\"Because no one is above the law!\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sept 16-20, 2024 KSM, et al., Pre-Trial Hearings - Judicial Watch","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sept 16-20, 2024 KSM, et al., Pre-Trial Hearings - Judicial Watch","og_url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/","og_site_name":"Judicial Watch","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JudicialWatch","og_image":[{"width":160,"height":160,"url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/blueseal.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@JudicialWatch","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/","name":"Sept 16-20, 2024 KSM, et al., Pre-Trial Hearings - Judicial Watch","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-11-25T16:44:08+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-25T16:44:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/sept-16-20-2024-ksm-et-al-pre-trial-hearings\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Documents","item":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/documents\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sept 16-20, 2024 KSM, et al., Pre-Trial Hearings"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/","name":"Judicial Watch","description":"Because no one is above the law!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents\/148104"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/documents"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/documents"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"financial-disclosures","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.judicialwatch.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/financial-disclosures?post=148104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}]